Dmx vs. SPI per punti a LED pixel: Qual è la differenza e quale scegliere?

Vantaggi dei punti DMX Pixel:
Stabilità su lunghe distanze:
DMX può trasmettere dati 100 Contatori con degradazione del segnale minimo, rendendolo ideale per la costruzione di facciate o luoghi di concerto.

Integrazione professionale:
Funziona con le scrivanie di illuminazione e il software DMX (per esempio. Madrix, Lightjams, Risolumo), preferito in concerti, Club, e grandi spettacoli.

Indirizzamento standardizzato:
Più facile gestire gli apparecchi in sistemi complessi a causa dell'indirizzo del canale fisso.

Segnale robusto:
Less prone to interference, especially in outdoor or industrial environments.

Advantages of SPI Pixel Dots:
Cost-Effective:
SPI chips like WS2811 and UCS1903 are budget-friendly and widely available.

High Pixel Density & Effects:
Perfect for intricate animations, smooth gradients, and color chases.

Simple Wiring:
Requires only data + power lines, making installation faster and cleaner.

Flexible Layouts:
Ideal for creative layouts like 3D pixel balls, mesh screens, and irregular surfaces.

Which One Should You Use?
Scenario Recommended Control
Large-scale outdoor building facade DMX
Budget-sensitive projects SPI
Need for professional lighting integration (with consoles) DMX
Complex animation with many pixels SPI
Long-distance stable communication DMX
Artistic, creative shapes and flexible mapping SPI
Conclusion
Both DMX and SPI have their own strengths depending on the project size, budget, and technical requirements. If you’re designing a high-end architectural lighting system, DMX may be the better choice. If you’re creating dynamic, colorful animations on a budget, SPI is ideal.

We offer both DMX and SPI pixel LED dots, and our team can help you select and configure the right system for your project.

Need help choosing? Contact us for a customized lighting solution!