DMX vs. SPI für Pixel-LED-Punkte: Was ist der Unterschied und welches sollte man wählen??

Vorteile von DMX Pixel Dots:
Stabilität über große Entfernungen:
DMX kann Daten übertragen 100 Messgeräte mit minimaler Signalverschlechterung, Damit eignet es sich ideal für Gebäudefassaden oder Konzerthallen.

Berufliche Integration:
Funktioniert mit Lichtpulten und DMX-Software (z.B. Madrix, LightJams, Resolume), bei Konzerten bevorzugt, Vereine, und große Shows.

Standardisierte Adressierung:
Einfachere Verwaltung von Geräten in komplexen Systemen durch feste Kanaladressierung.

Robustes Signal:
Less prone to interference, especially in outdoor or industrial environments.

Advantages of SPI Pixel Dots:
Cost-Effective:
SPI chips like WS2811 and UCS1903 are budget-friendly and widely available.

High Pixel Density & Effects:
Perfect for intricate animations, smooth gradients, and color chases.

Simple Wiring:
Requires only data + power lines, making installation faster and cleaner.

Flexible Layouts:
Ideal for creative layouts like 3D pixel balls, mesh screens, and irregular surfaces.

Which One Should You Use?
Scenario Recommended Control
Large-scale outdoor building facade DMX
Budget-sensitive projects SPI
Need for professional lighting integration (with consoles) DMX
Complex animation with many pixels SPI
Long-distance stable communication DMX
Artistic, creative shapes and flexible mapping SPI
Conclusion
Both DMX and SPI have their own strengths depending on the project size, budget, and technical requirements. If you’re designing a high-end architectural lighting system, DMX may be the better choice. If you’re creating dynamic, colorful animations on a budget, SPI is ideal.

We offer both DMX and SPI pixel LED dots, and our team can help you select and configure the right system for your project.

Need help choosing? Contact us for a customized lighting solution!